2024 WORLD SERIES PREVIEW
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| In the upcoming 2024 Mid-West Baseball League World Series between the Tempe Tempers and the Chicago Mobsters, the Tempe Tempers appear to have a significant advantage across multiple positions. Starting with the catcher position, J.T. Realmuto‘s experience and offensive versatility give Tempe an edge over Gabriel Moreno. At first base, Freddie Freeman‘s superior offensive stats, including home runs and RBIs, further strengthen Tempe’s lineup compared to Yandy Diaz of the Mobsters. Additionally, the Tempers’ advantage extends to second base with Ozzie Albies‘ power and run production outshining Luis Arraez‘s higher batting average.
The Tempers continue to dominate in the infield with Jose Ramirez at third base and Xander Bogaerts at shortstop, both providing more consistent offensive contributions than their Mobsters counterparts. In the outfield, Tempe’s combination of power from Marcell Ozuna and on-base skills from Steven Kwan and Austin Slater surpasses the Mobsters’ lineup. The designated hitter position also leans in favor of Tempe, with J.D. Martinez‘s power slightly outweighing Yordan Alvarez‘s on-base percentage. On the mound, Tempe’s starting and relief pitching, led by Gerrit Cole and a strong bullpen, present a formidable challenge for the Mobsters. Given these advantages, the Tempe Tempers are predicted to win the series in five games, leveraging their comprehensive strengths to secure another World Series victory. |
| CATCHER – J.T. Realmuto has the advantage over Gabriel Moreno. Realmuto’s proven track record as a top-tier catcher, his ability to contribute across multiple categories, and his unique base-stealing ability make him a valuable asset. Despite recent declines in batting average and on-base percentage, his overall offensive production, including 14 home runs and 66 RBIs, along with his experience and versatility, outweigh Moreno’s potential and current performance metrics. Moreno, while promising, is still developing and does not yet match Realmuto’s impact, particularly in terms of offensive versatility and experience. – ADVANTAGE – TEMPE
FIRST BASE – The Tempers Freddie Freeman seems to have the advantage over Yandy Diaz of the Chicago Mobsters. Freeman has superior numbers in key offensive categories such as home runs (26 vs. 18), RBIs (104 vs. 87), runs scored (124 vs. 68), and batting average (.332 vs. .301). Additionally, Freeman’s on-base percentage (.407) and slugging percentage (.550) are higher than Diaz’s, indicating a more potent offensive performance. Furthermore, Freeman’s ability to steal bases, despite a lower sprint speed, adds another dimension to his game, making him a more versatile and valuable player. Diaz, while having a strong season, particularly in getting on base, does not match Freeman’s overall impact and consistency. – ADVANTAGE – TEMPE SECOND BASE – The Tempe Tempers with Ozzie Albies seem to have the advantage over the Chicago Mobsters with Luis Arraez. Albies offers a significant power advantage with 24 home runs and 93 RBIs compared to Arraez’s 8 home runs and 47 RBIs. While Arraez has a higher batting average (.318) and on-base percentage (.341), Albies contributes more in terms of power and run production, which are crucial. Additionally, Albies’ ability to steal bases adds another dimension to his game, despite his lower batting average (.263). – ADVANTAGE – TEMPE THIRD BASE – The Tempe Tempers with Jose Ramirez appear to have the advantage. Ramirez has a higher batting average (.302), more home runs (33), and a higher slugging percentage (.527) compared to Alex Bregman of the Chicago Mobsters. Additionally, Ramirez’s ability to consistently produce despite a lack of supporting talent and his history of 20-20 seasons make him a valuable asset. While Bregman has potential for a strong season if lineup changes are made, Ramirez’s current performance metrics give the Tempe Tempers the edge. – ADVANTAGE – TEMPE SHORTSTOP – the Tempe Tempers with Xander Bogaerts seem to have the advantage over the Chicago Mobsters with Willy Adames. Bogaerts has a higher batting average (.257 vs. .206), on-base percentage (.331 vs. .287), and slugging percentage (.420 vs. .407), leading to a better overall OPS (.751 vs. .694). Additionally, Bogaerts contributed more RBI (90 vs. 68) and runs scored (81 vs. 68), indicating a more productive offensive performance. While Adames provides strong defense, Bogaerts’ offensive contributions and potential for improvement with the Padres’ lineup give the Tempe Tempers an edge. – ADVANTAGE – TEMPE OUTFIELD – The Tempe Tempers seem to have the advantage. Marcell Ozuna‘s strong power numbers with 32 home runs and a high slugging percentage of .508 provide significant offensive strength. Additionally, Steven Kwan‘s high batting average and on-base percentage contribute to consistent run production, despite his lower power numbers. Austin Slater, although limited in playing time, shows impressive stats when he does play. In contrast, the Chicago Mobsters have players like Julio Rodriguez, Riley Greene‘s, and Leodys Taveras with lower on-base percentages, which might limit their scoring opportunities. Overall, the Tempe Tempers’ combination of power and on-base skills gives them an edge. – ADVANTAGE – TEMPE DESIGNATED HITTER – The Tempe Tempers have the advantage in this comparison. While both Yordan Alvarez and J.D. Martinez have similar batting averages, Martinez has slightly more home runs (28 vs. 26) and a higher slugging percentage (.546 vs. .541). However, Alvarez has a significantly higher on-base percentage (.398 vs. .318) and a better OPS (.940 vs. .864), indicating he gets on base more frequently and contributes more to run production. Despite these stats, the advantage is given to Tempe, possibly due to Martinez’s higher home run count and slugging percentage, which are often valued in fantasy baseball for their impact on scoring. – ADVANTAGE – TEMPE STARTING PITCHING – The Tempe Tempers have the advantage over the Chicago Mobsters. The Tempe Tempers’ pitching lineup includes standout performances from Gerrit Cole with a 1.83 ERA and 254 strikeouts, and Sonny Gray with a 2.27 ERA and 200 strikeouts. Additionally, Jacob deGrom and Brandon Woodruff have exceptionally low ERAs of 0.51 and 1.19, respectively, showcasing their dominance. In contrast, while the Chicago Mobsters have solid pitchers like Logan Gilbert and Chris Bassitt, their ERAs and strikeout numbers are not as impressive as those of the Tempe Tempers’ pitchers. The depth and performance of Tempe’s pitchers give them a clear advantage. – ADVANTAGE – TEMPE RELIEF PITCHING – The Tempe Tempers have the advantage over the Chicago Mobsters based on their reliever statistics. Tempe’s relievers have generally lower ERAs and more saves, indicating stronger performance in high-leverage situations. Notably, Tempe’s relievers like Pagan and Munoz have high save counts (18 and 31 respectively), which suggests they are effective in closing games. Additionally, Tempe’s relievers have a better overall strikeout-to-walk ratio, which is a key indicator of pitching effectiveness. – ADVANTAGE – TEMPE |
HITTING
| TEM – HITTERS | AVG | G | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SO | BB | SB |
| FREEMAN, F. | .332 | 162 | 680 | 124 | 226 | 66 | 2 | 26 | 104 | 153 | 66 | 31 |
| SLATER, A. | .325 | 86 | 114 | 18 | 37 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 33 | 12 | 0 |
| JONES, N. | .312 | 28 | 77 | 16 | 24 | 6 | 0 | 7 | 10 | 19 | 14 | 5 |
| RAMIREZ, J. | .302 | 162 | 613 | 106 | 185 | 35 | 2 | 33 | 95 | 89 | 70 | 32 |
| GOMES, Y. | .276 | 97 | 196 | 23 | 54 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 19 | 56 | 10 | 1 |
| KWAN, S. | .271 | 162 | 469 | 59 | 127 | 15 | 2 | 6 | 64 | 81 | 53 | 19 |
| PERALTA, D. | .270 | 116 | 204 | 26 | 55 | 17 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 34 | 10 | 0 |
| ROSARIO, E. | .267 | 35 | 101 | 10 | 27 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 13 | 29 | 1 | 0 |
| OZUNA, M. | .266 | 158 | 478 | 72 | 127 | 20 | 0 | 32 | 86 | 142 | 48 | 0 |
| ALBIES, O. | .263 | 162 | 556 | 88 | 146 | 25 | 4 | 24 | 93 | 116 | 55 | 15 |
| MARTINEZ, J. | .259 | 150 | 405 | 51 | 105 | 30 | 1 | 28 | 78 | 114 | 36 | 0 |
| BOGAERTS, X. | .257 | 160 | 526 | 81 | 135 | 22 | 5 | 18 | 90 | 121 | 54 | 23 |
| REALMUTO, J. | .256 | 145 | 414 | 70 | 106 | 26 | 7 | 14 | 66 | 114 | 40 | 23 |
| HAGGERTY, S. | .254 | 43 | 67 | 16 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 16 |
| ABREU, W. | .246 | 29 | 69 | 10 | 17 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 27 | 6 | 3 |
| MATEO, J. | .182 | 102 | 165 | 34 | 30 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 17 | 49 | 13 | 31 |
| CHI – HITTERS | AVG | G | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SO | BB | SB |
| ARRAEZ, L. | .318 | 143 | 613 | 83 | 195 | 34 | 2 | 8 | 47 | 47 | 19 | 0 |
| BELT, B. | .317 | 24 | 63 | 11 | 20 | 6 | 0 | 7 | 19 | 25 | 9 | 0 |
| DIAZ, Y. | .301 | 137 | 522 | 68 | 157 | 32 | 1 | 18 | 87 | 81 | 63 | 1 |
| ALVAREZ, Y. | .259 | 110 | 375 | 57 | 97 | 28 | 0 | 26 | 83 | 92 | 73 | 0 |
| GREENE, R. | .248 | 110 | 303 | 42 | 75 | 10 | 4 | 10 | 38 | 95 | 37 | 9 |
| McCUTCHEN, A. | .245 | 80 | 208 | 27 | 51 | 6 | 0 | 8 | 29 | 46 | 34 | 6 |
| BREGMAN, A. | .241 | 159 | 610 | 110 | 147 | 26 | 7 | 15 | 68 | 84 | 112 | 5 |
| RODRIGUEZ, J. | .240 | 155 | 608 | 90 | 146 | 32 | 1 | 26 | 94 | 178 | 38 | 21 |
| TAVERAS, L. | .239 | 138 | 498 | 54 | 119 | 27 | 6 | 11 | 67 | 138 | 24 | 14 |
| MARTE, N. | .230 | 48 | 74 | 8 | 17 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 15 | 6 | 1 |
| MORENO, G. | .218 | 109 | 335 | 28 | 73 | 20 | 1 | 4 | 32 | 75 | 23 | 2 |
| BETHANCOURT, C. | .208 | 75 | 212 | 22 | 44 | 12 | 2 | 5 | 24 | 66 | 10 | 0 |
| ADAMES, W. | .206 | 150 | 533 | 68 | 110 | 31 | 2 | 24 | 68 | 179 | 60 | 6 |
| TORKELSON, S. | .200 | 29 | 100 | 8 | 20 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 26 | 9 | 0 |
STARTING PITCHING
| TEM – STARTERS | W | L | ERA | GS | CG | SO | QS | IP | H | R | ER | HR | SO | BB |
| deGROM, J. | 3 | 0 | 0.51 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 53 | 21 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 64 | 10 |
| WOODRUFF, B. | 10 | 1 | 1.19 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 75.2 | 29 | 12 | 10 | 5 | 98 | 17 |
| MAYZA, T. | 2 | 0 | 1.55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 19 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 25 | 11 |
| COLE, G. | 19 | 3 | 2.01 | 24 | 7 | 2 | 15 | 161.1 | 71 | 39 | 36 | 14 | 157 | 42 |
| GRAY, S. | 19 | 5 | 2.27 | 35 | 2 | 1 | 22 | 226 | 145 | 59 | 57 | 18 | 200 | 56 |
| CHI – STARTERS | W | L | ERA | GS | CG | SO | QS | IP | H | R | ER | HR | SO | BB |
| BASSITT, C. | 8 | 2 | 2.56 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 140.2 | 87 | 47 | 40 | 19 | 138 | 36 |
| GILBERT, L. | 7 | 4 | 2.95 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 85.1 | 62 | 30 | 28 | 10 | 76 | 16 |
| MILLER, B. | 11 | 9 | 4.15 | 24 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 138.2 | 125 | 72 | 64 | 20 | 153 | 29 |
RELIEF PITCHING
| TEM – RELIEF | W | L | ERA | SV | BS | HLD | IP | H | R | ER | HR | SO | BB | SO/BB |
| VERLANDER, J. | 1 | 0 | 1.23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7.1 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 2.5 |
| MAYZA, T. | 2 | 0 | 1.55 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 29 | 19 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 25 | 11 | 2.3 |
| BRASIER, R. | 6 | 2 | 2.07 | 6 | 5 | 26 | 74 | 42 | 17 | 17 | 4 | 73 | 16 | 4.6 |
| PAGAN, E. | 7 | 3 | 1.61 | 18 | – | – | 89.1 | 42 | 17 | 16 | 7 | 79 | 21 | 3.7 |
| MINTER, A. | 3 | 4 | 2.16 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 75 | 53 | 20 | 18 | 9 | 83 | 26 | 3.2 |
| MUNOZ, A. | 6 | 2 | 2.56 | 31 | 6 | 0 | 63.1 | 34 | 21 | 18 | 6 | 71 | 19 | 3.7 |
| CHI – RELIEF | W | L | ERA | SV | BS | HLD | IP | H | R | ER | HR | SO | BB | SO/BB |
| FRANCIS, B. | 1 | 1 | 1.46 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 12.1 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 1.8 |
| WILLIAMS, D. | 3 | 1 | 1.61 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 50.1 | 25 | 10 | 9 | 4 | 61 | 20 | 3 |
| BAUTISTA, F. | 4 | 6 | 2.14 | 14 | 4 | 6 | 67.1 | 35 | 20 | 16 | 7 | 76 | 18 | 4.2 |
| ABREU, B. | 2 | 0 | 2.18 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 20.2 | 19 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 23 | 3 | 7.7 |
| MOORE, M. | 0 | 0 | 2.45 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 25.2 | 20 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 33 | 9 | 3.7 |
| CANO, Y. | 2 | 2 | 2.68 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 50.1 | 25 | 17 | 15 | 6 | 51 | 13 | 3.9 |
| DURAN, J. | 2 | 2 | 2.77 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 52 | 27 | 22 | 16 | 6 | 68 | 19 | 3.6 |
| CHAPMAN, A. | 2 | 0 | 3.31 | 6 | 0 | 9 | 49 | 29 | 19 | 18 | 10 | 62 | 18 | 3.4 |
| DOVAL, C. | 2 | 2 | 3.33 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 48.2 | 37 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 63 | 12 | 5.3 |









